≡ Menu
iphone 6

Once again Apple has come out with the hottest phone on the market just in time for the holidays. If you have not ordered your yet, you may still have time to get it in time for Christmas. But what makes the newest IPhone so much better than the others? Is there that much of a difference? Well let us go over a few of the specs between the Iphone 5 compared to the Iphone 6 and we will let you decide.

If you are ugrading from an older model than the Iphone 5 to the 6 or 6 Plus then it really should be a no brainer. You are going to get a much better camera at 8mp. Unless you are going to a 6 Plus from a 5 it is still the same camera. But now you are also getting the A8 chip which makes the phone faster and you have new Touch ID. And of course the new iOS 8 system is on both the 6 and the 6 plus. Both the 6 and the 6 Pus have the HD retina display but the 6 screen size is 4.7″ while the 6 Plus boasts a much larger 5.5″ screen which is a first large screen phone for Apple. So coming from a 5 or 5s to a regular Iphone6 might not seem worth the upgrade for a mere 0.7″ larger screen but that is for each to decide. From a spec standpoint. The Iphone 5 and the Iphone 6 are not much different.

Unless you are one of those that need to and can afford to keep up with the costs of each new Iphone its hard to warrant the cost for a similar phone. But if you are coming again from before a Iphone 5 to upgrade the costs still are significantly different. As of now you can get the Iphone 5 for around $100  and the Iphone 6 around $4-500 for  while the 6 Plus can be closer to $600 unless your carrier can get you an upgrade or you are signing a new contract. So go test them out in stores. Fell how they are in your hand and determine whether the costs justifies the upgrade.


It may be worth noting how much Amazon has arrived since the first days of the Fire line. With the very first generation, it was difficult to view the tablet as something more than a system made to keep customers locked in the Kindle ecosystem. It was as the BlackBerry PlayBook really uninspired bit of hardware that apparently arrived off exactly the same factory line. Nevertheless, Amazon’s new HDX tablets are not the sexiest products around, but the company’s taken great effort to make certain they are a few of the finest. That means some zippy internals, a stellar display and a body. Beginning at $379 for the 8.9inch version, the cost has come along for the ride too. It is hardly pricey, but we have long ceased utilizing the term “budget” to explain it.

This comes with some disadvantages, of course — specifically, an ecosystem that is much more shut-off than routine Android would be. But so long as you are caught with Fire OS, the organization’s heading to do what it could to provide the finest experience possible with the inclusion of some powerful features.


  • CPU – Quad-core 2.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon800
  • Operating system – Fire OS 3
  • Memory – 16GB, 32GB, 64GB
  • Display – 8.9in (2560×1600 pixels)
  • Camera – 8 megapixel
  • Wireless – Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, wireless LAN,Bluetooth 4.0
  • Ports – microUSB, 3.5mm headphone jack
  • Size – 231x158x8mm
  • Weight – 374g (Wi-Fi), 384g (4G)


It’s come a really long way since the Fire came out, and of course. In Addition, at 13.2 oz, it even manages to become 0.7 oz lighter than last year’s 7-inch edition.

The back of the 8.9 is almost identical to the 7-inch version, which would be to say this is largely fashioned out of nice soft touch stuff. Yet again, also, that back cover houses a huge, lustrous Amazon “A to Z” emblem. As with the remainder of the Fire line, the organization’s gotten a little more competitive with branding. But hey, what can you really expect? And furthermore, we strongly urge you get a case in which means you’ll probably have that branding all covered up anyway.

The back is a little curved on all sides, creating the tablet more comfortable to carry. The buttons is also larger now, as a welcome development in which we foresee many consumers will like. Along the peak of the trunk side is a strip that houses two rear facing loudspeaker grilles. In addition, unlike the 7-inch edition, it creates space for an 8-megapixel camera and flash.

The Fire is only thick enough to adapt the headphone jack in the sides and also the microUSB charging port in the left. Up best, you’ll find these double-mic holes in which will be useful for your Mayday support. Yet again, there isn’t any HDMI outlet here. Amazon certainly wants you to utilize its Second Display technology to view videos in your TELEVISION, keeping you further locked in to its content store. Nonetheless, the improvement of an HDMI interface could have been another fine way of differentiating the higher end 8.9inch design in the smaller variation. Like last time, there isn’t any micro-sd slot aboard; Amazon has consistently argued that people ought to use cloud storage rather (and furthermore, it is never been a huge supporter of side-loading either).


It has turned out to become certainly one of the nippiest we purchased, and certainly the nippiest to come from Amazon. While we are not able to become benchmark the tablet PC because of the lack of benchmarking software available. The interface is simple to browse, apps open fast, and also the tablet PC breezed via an hour long HD movie on Netflix without showing any signs of struggle.

OS (Operating System)

It is all Amazon. You’ll get applications from the retailer’s Kindle shop, and also you’ll find some preloaded in the tablet PC, including Amazon’s Silk browser, e-mail app plus a shopping program.

Amazon controls almost everything in the tablet PC, which is only when you see the Kindle application shop which you’ll realize how constrictive this is. Others like 4OD and Instagram are nowhere found, although most of the big name applications exist, including FB, Twitter, Spotify and Netflix. Search the “Top Application List” and you’ll see various third party social media apps and games which you’ll never take another look at.

Naturally, you can pay an additional GBP10 on the peak of the tablet PC’s cost to eliminate these, but again it looks like another effort by Amazon to profit.

When it comes to interface, the Fire OS is fairly thin. It is simple to browse, and its own big icons make everything look straightforward. For all of us, however, everything is a little too easy, but maybe this can be pleasing to first time tablet user.

A carousel dominates the very top of the Kindle Fire HDX’s 8.9 homescreen, displaying your most recently employed applications or these you decide to appear within the wheel. Scroll down and you’ll find all of your other programs, even though a black bar on the other side of the top enables you to browse round the various Amazon functions, including Store, Games, Books, Movies and Newsstand.

This function is surprisingly good, and it is another bonus for first-time tablet users.


It took Amazon three generations to deliver a back-facing camera for the Fire line. Just the bigger version has one though. After getting through the inherent awkwardness of capturing pictures on the 9-inch tablet, we discovered the camera performs fairly well. Colours look great in the daytime, although they begin to seem washed in more overcast conditions. Issues were a little more irregular under the harsh light, which project a reddish tinge over a lot of our sample photos.

Sadly, there isn’t a lot the applications can perform to help. The application is very much in need of some TLC, as back cameras represent a fresh area of emphasis for Amazon. As you can on a number of other mobile devices, you may also choose to focus. After you have taken a photograph, you can discuss it via Twitter, FB and e-mail from inside the application. In configurations, you may throw to panorama mode and turn HDR off and on. That last mode does a respectable enough job stitching images together; however it is hard to have a panorama that’s not at least somewhat blurry. In Addition, the capability to correct such things as white balance with an application would have been fine.


Sure Amazon’s a huge believer in the cloud, however it is still providing you with a range of internal storage alternatives: 16-gb ($379), 32GB ($429) and 64GB ($479). As ever, these tiers comprise Special Offers. Should you not need to get irritated with a regular flow of advertisements, you’ll need to include $25 to each of the aforementioned costs. That’ll be an additional $100, bringing the cost of the highest end device to $594. For another $10 per month, you may include your 4G Kindle Fire HDX to your AT&T Cellular Discuss or Verizon’s Share Everything.

The 8.9inch HDX is driven by an identical chip within the 7-inch model — but that is not a bad thing. The quadcore 2.2GHz Snapdragon 800 chip is a huge step up from this past year’s dual core 1.5GHz, and it is really one of the finest chips you’ll see in almost any mobile device today. Amazon’s provided the graphics performance a boost too with the inclusion of a “console quality” Adreno 330 GPU, guaranteeing four times the efficiency of its own predecessor.


Amazon are praised for transferring the Fire’s loudspeakers toward the top. The positioning on the HD always looked a bit absurd, to give a bit of context. Amazon needed to understand that as the tablet was held by users, muffled sound was virtually a guarantee. Just like the past generation, Amazon’s leveraging Dolby sound for the stereo speakers. You are best off depending on an outside speaker when possible; at maximum volume, audio fidelity is lost, while they get loud. They will be finefor seeing fast videos, but if you really intend on listening to lots of music, some additional sound equipment may be needed.

Amazon is certainly waging a conflict to the screen front, as the speakers feel like something of an afterthought. That’s a huge leap up from your HD 8.9’s 1,920 x 1,200 display, as well as the fresh HDX 7-inch tablet, with a 1,920 x 1,200 display. It is merely a thing to behold and watching it in joy. Heck, it even was able to make Sharknado appear fairly good, that is no small accomplishment. Overall, pictures are sharp, the amount of detail is notable and the colours are lively.

The organization also assures you may easily utilize the device outside, thanks to dynamic picture contrast, which adjusts the contrast (rather than merely brightness) of each pixel, founded in the light reaching the camera’s detector. The tablet is still ruled by the highly reflective display out for poolside use, as the feature normally functions as advertised. As ever, for this reason you may purchase one of Amazon’s E-ink e-readers instead.


As good as Amazon is getting at producing tablet components (and it is getting fairly good really), the company’s strategy to applications remains a polarizing one. Amazon’s business model, in the end, revolves around a closed off edition of Android that keeps customers locked in to its content offerings. Fortunately, the company made some improvement on this part, started by providing its application a name: Fire OS.

The layout of the homepage betrays Amazon’s clear aim for the gadget, serving up content in a big carousel in the centre. Here’s wherever your applications, movies, books, etc reside. Above it is still another portal to content: a toolbar featuring classes like applications, games, books, music and movies. Click on one of these, and you will always check out whatever you have picked up through Amazon, broken up in your in cloud and on device choices. There is, still, a crucial difference to the home display. A swipe up reveals an even more conventional grid-design icon layout.

And, naturally, Play Shop access is really a no-go, though again. Openness, in the end, has never actually been part of Amazon’s game program with all the Fire line. The company sells you a tool pretty much at a price and also you get locked in to Amazon’s application and content stores. That’s the bargain. After all, Amazon’s been making a huge drive to create the most used applications to its ecosystem, and also the choice just gets better as the Fire’s develop.


-          Great display, smooth operation, amazing battery life, light and slim.

-          Cameras are merely typical, interface is too simplified.

-          App choice is less

Just because the HD marked a huge improvement within the very first generation, the HDX brings numerous superior characteristics that places Amazon’s offers on par with a few of the greatest tablets. The display is amazing; processing power is bumped up significantly; there is eventually a back-facing camera; as well as the hardware is noticeably slimmer. Additions like Mayday tech support and 2nd Display provide a compelling consumer experience, in the applications side. Having said that, the constraints of Fire OS versus normal Android will almost surely continue to dissuade some consumers from getting the plunge.

But with the $ 80 cost rise over its predecessor, the section of the Fire line has went well beyond the budget group that first explained it. And at the close of the day, the $150 cost increase in the 7-inch model does not bring that lot of added attributes. Priced anywhere from $379 to just under $600, it is a quite huge splurge to get a holiday present, but it is a decent amount to ask to get a tablet that barely cuts any corners.


In reality, the app is expected to establish at some point now about the Windows Shop, though you’ll have to request a key from Microsoft if you expect to take part in the beta.

Project Spark is basically Microsoft’s effort at making programmers out of its community of Windows and Xbox users. Microsoft hasn’t yet specified how many testers will be accepted to the beta, in the official Project Spark site though you are able to request your key.

The job isn’t completely original in theory, but might prove to be absolutely the most advanced option however. Consumers will have plenty of resources at their disposal within Project Spark, letting a wide variety of customizabiliy, as well as SmartGlass, X-box One controller, and keyboard/mouse support. In addition (and perhaps most impressively), the Kinect will provide a method of capturing motion and voice for facial animations, movement, and so forth, if you’re fleshing out a customized character or possibly a cinematic.

The beta will probably be making its approach to Xbox One in January of next year.

surface 2

When Microsoft had to write down $900 million of unwanted stock in July this year, there was just one device that could be responsible.

The Top tablet or tablets instead; the RT along with the more costly Pro – are not best loved by consumers, with all the original pair basically laughed out-of town when Microsoft claimed they offered the functionality of both a laptop and a tablet.

Microsoft is still making the same claims which is difficult to believe. However, with this specific update to the Surface line, they’re closer than they have ever been before. Although wide swathes of the industry attempt to become the 7 – inch king of amusement with Apple positioning the iPad atmosphere for a productivity device of their own, it is worth seeing precisely how far Microsoft came with it.

Microsoft has launched its next gen tablets, the Surface Pro 2 , which – the Windows RT – toting Surface 2, a direct replacement for the original Surface RT.

A year ago Microsoft launched Surface as its almost-Windows tablet that nearly succeeded in bringing Windows to the tablet form-factor. It was as thin as an iPad, it included a full-size USB port and practically complete Office Apps, it had a kickstand to hold this up and you can snap on an astonishingly thin keyboard (at extra cost).

But Windows 8 and Windows RT did not get a part of the iOS and Android applications, the kickstand didn’t consistently hold this up in your lap and not everyone like Windows 8 enough to see Surface like an actual iPad challenger. The impressive features did not make for impressive revenue.

Good thing is that in the Surface 2, Microsoft has undertaken a good deal of the problems – in hardware and software from the original Surface to Surface 2 – in addition to enhancing its specs.


Design and Assemble

Firstly, the Surface Pro 2 is visually identical to its predecessor. It’s produced in the same Microsoft patented When Microsoft had to write down $900 million of unwanted stock in July this year, there was just one device that could be responsible.

The Top tablet – or, tablets instead; the RT along with the more costly Pro – are not best loved by clients, with all the original pair basically laughed out-of town when Microsoft claimed they offered the functionality of both a laptop and a tablet.

Microsoft are still making the same claims which is still as tough difficult. However, with this specific update to the Surface line, they’re closer than they have ever been before. Although wide swathes of the industry attempt to become the 7 – inch king of amusement with Apple positioning the iPad atmosphere for a productivity device of their own, it is worth seeing precisely how far Microsoft came with the Top.

Microsoft has launched its next gen tablets, the Surface Pro 2 , which – the Windows RT – toting Surface 2, a direct replacement for the original Surface RT.

A year ago Microsoft launched Surface as its almost-Windows tablet that nearly succeeded in bringing Windows to the tablet form-factor. It was as thin as an iPad, it included a full-size USB port and practically complete Office, it had a kickstand to hold this up and you can snap on an astonishingly thin keyboard (at extra cost).

But Windows 8 and Windows RT did not get a part of the iOS and Android applications, the kickstand didn’t consistently hold this up in your lap and not everyone like Windows 8 enough to see Surface like an actual iPad challenger. The impressive features did not make for impressive revenue.

For Surface 2, Microsoft has undertaken a good deal of the problems – in hardware and software – in addition to enhancing the specs.

Design and Assemble

Firstly, the Surface Pro 2 is visually identical to its predecessor. It’s produced in the same Microsoft-patented VaporMG substance and still offers a definitely ‘premium’ feel (although it also attracts both smudges and nicks). It also has the same port allocation, meaning there’s an USB 3.0 connection for your various sticks and drives – something the iPad nevertheless does not offer.

Unfortunately, the Pro 2 also has the Professional’s same weight issue: it’s 900 grams and more than half an inch thick. This might not sound like much but, it’s just less than double the size and weight of the new iPad atmosphere and it indicates the Pro 2 never feels like a tablet. You wouldn’t take it out in the bus to read ebooks with, although you may if you may grab a table in the train.

Surface 2 is very similar weight as the initial Surface RT. At 676g it’s a small fraction heavier than last year’s iPad 4 (which has a smaller 9.7-inch display) but it is positively weighty in comparison to the new 469grams iPad Air.

It truly is comfortable to hold, in one hand or two, and light enough to carry around without weighing you down. And it still packs more useful ports into the case than about any other tablet PC.

Network alternatives are 802.11n Wi-Fi (with an extra-powerful diversity antenna that sees even more wireless access points than the initial Surface, which can get online when even notebook PCs can’t find a connection) and Bluetooth 4.0, with potential LTE models expected next year.

The new kickstand provides you with the option of having the screen mainly vertical or leaning it that little bit farther back if you want to avoid glare with an overhead light, touch the screen at a more comfortable angle or allow it to be balance more securely on your own lap.

The kickstand stops first within its original location and remains there securely regardless of how much you tap or swipe on the screen, once you pull it out. If you need the wider stance, pull the kickstand more and you have the ‘wider stance’ option with the help of the kickstand.

As with the initial kickstand, that is a pleasure to work with as well as superbly engineered. It will not slip from 1 spot to the other however it is not stiff or embarrassing to work with. It’s amazing to truly have the additional flexibility; you may end up picking the wider position some of the time even if you were perfectly satisfied with the angle of the original kickstand.

The new angle definitely makes the Surface 2 more comfortable to perch on your lap, with or with no keyboard.

In case you have short legs, it really is undoubtedly easier to use Surface 2 on your own lap with all the keyboard thanks to the mixture of the brand-new kickstand, the light weight and the more rigid keyboard covers; the Surface 2 balances more securely and is not heavy enough to take away from the magnetic connection so you may hold it in your lap by the pressure of your fingers in the keys, the way you can with a standard notebook. (Taller users with longer legs will nonetheless value the balance.)


3D Mark for Windows RT: Ice Storm Severe – 9,192, Ice Storm Unlimited: 13,151
Battery life: 5-6 hours for intensive use
PirateMark HTML5 evaluation: 12.4

At any angle, the new complete HD screen is amazing, though not obviously in the same group as Apple’s retina display. It is crisper, brighter and more bright than the initial Surface display – or the original Surface Professional. Reds and greens are somewhat more intense but whites and yellows remain bright and clean and also the colours you see are more precise.

The 1,920 by 1080 resolution is wonderful for films (and means you’ll keep the DPI and zoom settings up, because while text is crisp, clear and easy it may also be a little small on the 10.6-inch screen). There’s far less glare than on most displays; the way Microsoft bonds together the distinct layers of the display also makes blacks far blacker than standard, giving a good contrast ratio to it.

The original Surface scarcely felt sluggish before. A little demanding but the mixture of Windows 8, the hardware acceleration in IE 11, the 1.7GHz quad-core Tegra 4 chipset and 2GB of RAM make even the 32GB Surface 2 feel much faster.

We didn’t see much slowdown as we opened more apps and webpages; apps found quickly and you can swipe quickly to some other app, despite multiple apps and several IE tabs open.

On Microsoft’s own PirateMark Html-5 test the Surface 2 scored 12.4, when compared with nine seconds on an original Surface Professional and 24 seconds on an original Surface (all operating Windows 8.1). The brand new chip and graphics are quicker, in applications as well as on sites that will make the most of them.


Battery and Display

The battery life is one of the very significant areas of development for the Top Pro. The first generation barely lasted for more than four hours at a time but the new model (with help from a firmware update out earlier this month) readily pushes past the eight hour mark.

This means you’ll receive the full day’s work-out of it and considering how you might utilize the device (eg, a couple hours per day during travel) then you might not even need a charger for days at a time.

However, you’ll have to dial down that battery life if you plan to take full advantage of the Pro 2’s gorgeous screen. The 10.6inch screen is full HD with a 1920 x 1080 resolution that offers wonderful viewing angles. And although the display can feel somewhat letter boxy when browing the web, the slightly flattened ratio is good for pictures.


Windows RT 8.1

Surface 2 runs Windows RT 8.1. The OS was much maligned, but apart from not being able to install any desktop applications (beyond the Office desktop programs and IE which are built in), it truly is indistinguishable from utilizing the full Windows 8.1.

General Windows RT is not so bad, but the key difficulty is that we’re all utterly used to the way background programs work, in addition to the functions they perform. The Windows Store apps do not yet fill the gap that the dearth of desktop apps leaves.



This really is how Microsoft is actually trying to sell the Surface Professional – for a device which could change out your laptop and supply exactly the same functionality. In regard to specs there’s no doubt the Surface Pro 2 is remarkable: there is just a fourth-generation Intel Haswell i5 powering the thing and you may pick 4GB or 8GB of RAM. Hard-drives go from 64GB to 512GB, even though there is also 200GB free cloud storage for a couple of years.

In pure numbers, the Pro 2 is easily the equal of more equivalent notebooks – although in its highest specifications (together with the keyboard on top) it does end up as pricier than an equivalent laptop from Apple. That will certainly be a sticking point for many but the most partisan users.

But, the problem with being productive on the Surface is with the applications, not the hardware.

It is all good, but when you attempt any serious multi-tasking everything just seems that everything takes a couple more steps than you’d like when you are just working in just one window. Microsoft have attempted to fix this with more options to carve the screen in two and change between windows, but it’s simply not enough. This really will not put it behind its rivals, but it doesn’t drive it out in front both.



I have to admit, I have a little a soft spot for the Surface. The look and feel of the device are fabulous and Microsoft throws all the perks it can at you: free cloud storage, free Skype calls, even a very under publicized but very good advertising-supported music streaming service, Xbox Music. The hardware is all there also; in terms of battery life and strength, layout and display quality.

Unfortunately, the price is still a major sticking point. Yes, the Pro 2 ‘starts’ at GBP719 but once you take into consideration what you desire it becomes a costly device. There’s the keyboard (GBP829); as the OS takes up almost half a 64GB drive so you’ll probably wish to bump that up to 128GB storage (GBP909); and you’ll need Office if you’re going to get any work done (currently discounted from GBP80 to GBP60 – so it’s now GBP969).

At this point the Surface Pro 2 costs GBP100 over a 11-inch MacBook Air with almost identical specs, and if you’re just purchasing this device for light-use then, well, you’ll want to look elsewhere.

The chief difficulty for the Top 2 is the dearth of a full operating system. Windows RT has no mode with no legacy software. As a compensation it comes with Office (saving you the GBP60) but you’ll still have to have a keyboard to make any use of this.

Rates begin from GBP359 for GBP439 and 32GB device for 64GB – so this still isn’t an inexpensive device, however it is worth contemplating rather than instantaneously discarding as an alternative.

{ 1 comment }

Google has quietly obtained seven US and Japanese robotic companies in the past six months ahead of the launch of a recent job that is certainly being headed by Andy Rubin, the former head of Android who vacated that part in March. Google is not shy of letting the world know about its investments in tasks, like Google Glass, cars and air balloon broadband,  but it has been keeping its Google X robotics initiatives a little bit more under wraps.

In an interview with the New-york Times, Rubin said he had convinced Larry Page and Google founders Sergey Brin that now was the time to make a transfer to robotics, though such a strategy may not provide results in the short term.

“Like any moonshot, you need to think of time as a variable. We want enough runway and a 10-year vision,” Rubin told the paper.

The seven companies Rubin has helped Google get recently contain Japan based Schaft, a maker of humanoids, and Industrial Perception, making robotic 3D vision. US businesses it has got contain Redword Robotics, Artificial Intelligence Lab spinoff and a MIT Computer Science, and Meka. Both make humanoid robots and robot arms. Robotic camera system manufacturer Bot & Dolly has also joined Google, including design firm Autofuss, and Holomni, a design firm which makes wheels.

Although Rubin likened the robotics task to Google’s driverless vehicle initiative, the robotics initiatives won’t be targeted at consumers, but instead industrial applications.Rubin pointed to chances in production and logistics, highlighting frustrations with the complexity of the consumer electronics industry, which is dominated by labour intensive assembly.

Even though it is not known as a different subsidiary or if it will work as a group inside Google, the robotics unit will be located in Palo Alto with offices in Japan.


Let’s be clear: I think that Windows 8 is in many ways a great operating system. But it really is also a very polarizing one amongst long-time Windows users and that’s something Microsoft will dismiss at its own peril. First, let’s go through Windows 8’s evident virtues — it runs considerably more easily than earlier versions of Windows, it starts up more quickly and is normally a more secure platform than Windows 7. However, for a substantial chunk of PC users these plusses are outweighed by the giant minus of the large changes Microsoft made to the traditional Windows interface.

Take two of my own friends who recently made the upgrade to Windows 8.1 from Windows 7. Upon installing the application, one of them said that “the only way they will make it worse is when the right mouse-click [would] be replaced by smashing your right thumb with a hammer.” Another purely stated that he “took my CPU back because of that rubbish” and changed back to Windows 7.

Clearly, there’s a good deal more than simply my friends’ personal anecdotes to demonstrate that Windows 8 is either a loveit-or-hate-it proposition for a lot of long-time customers. And then there’s use info: We learned earlier this week that Windows 7 is still growing more quickly than Windows 8 and 8.1. And this chart from Statista reveals that Windows 8’s complete adoption rate among COMPUTER users is lagging badly behind where Windows 7 was at this stage in its life-cycle.

There are two problems here, both of which were rehashed to departure: Many people hate the Metro UI and they miss the Start menu.

The problem with the new Start button, nevertheless, is that left clicking on it merely returns these customers to the Metro screen they hate with all their hearts. And for a lot of consumers, dislike of the Metro screen has already reached Dr. Seuss-like proportions: They hate it in their houses, they do not like it on their telephones; they will not click upon its tiles, they won’t use it to obtain files; they want that it would go and perish, they hate Metro UI.

Now, there are definitely some significant rejoinders to this: You can right click in the new Start button to have a far more conventional menu which will give access to you to some, although not all, of the attributes of the old Start menu. Still, you can use a third party applications like Classic Shell and StartMenu8 to bring back the classic Start-menu. And you can take a bunch of different measures to modify your settings and make certain that you don’t ever need to see another “Live Tile” ever again.

If Microsoft truly wants these folks to remain loyal users within the coming years, it may need to suck this up and recreate the full conventional Start menu.


This week, the USB 3.0 Advocate Group announced that for the brand new version of USB, called USB 3.1, it will have a fresh connector which is about the extent of the Micro USB connector that plugs into most smartphones and other portable gadgets as of late. Furthermore, this new connector will be flappable: It might be turned in either case and still connect.

Beyond the brand new connector type, the specs for USB 3.1 comprise a 10-Gb-per second data speed, twice that of USB 3. It’s also going to be upgraded for greater power transport, letting more energy-hungry devices to perform via USB without a power plug.

Higher data speeds help with larger HD videos and pictures, increased energy transfer helps with charging mobile devices, and getting the connector be flippable helps with consumer frustration.

USB 3.1 also designed to measure up to opponents. Apple’s Lightning connector is flippable since its release in September 2012 with the iPhone 5. Intel’s Thunderbolt connection runs at 10 Gbps as well as the approaching Thunderbolt 2 will support up-to 20 Gbps, essential for streaming 4K video to screens, according to Intel. Products supporting Thunderbolt 2 have just began to be introduced, with the primary ones released in October.


2015 Ford Mustang Review, Price and Specs

Fifty years after Ford first unveiled the Mustang at the New York World’s Reasonable, the American automaker is betting a total redesign will make the automobile appeal to drivers throughout the world.

TIME-GOT an exclusive look into the sixth-generation Mustang’s development, including some never before seen images that are now available online for everyone. The vehicle, that will go on sale next year as a 2015 version, is lower, sleeker and wider compared to the Mustang. The most notable difference: this is the first Mustang to be created for foreign markets, as Ford attempts to turn an American icon into its worldwide main.

Ford executives and engineers told TIME they found themselves straining to fill the demands of motorists in Europe and Asia, produce a Mustang with rightside steering for the Great Britain, India and Australia, while keeping the operation American customers expect. At one-point the job had to be rebooted because initial designs were not meeting these requirements, TIME has discovered. That price Ford millions. The brand new Mustang will also have a surprise below the hood: an optional 4-cylinder, turbo charged engine. It’s a nod to Europe, where gas costs are twice those in the U.S.A. but also dangers undercutting the Mustang’s marketable tradition like a V8 power machine.

Now, by producing a Mustang for sale round the earth, Ford is going to be extending its strategy of building so called world cars that may be marketed profitably in a broad array of markets with arguably its most recognizable brand.


The bendable, flexible mobile runs on Android and went on sale in South Korea only 10 days ago. Company executives said there isn’t any word yet on when it’s going to be accessible in the United States.
However, in showing off the telephone, LG execs seemed ready to talk about the way that it could be the beginning of thinking otherwise about designing gadgets, particularly as the age of wearable computing dawns.

Experimenting with the curve was, in part, an exercise in thinking about how such gizmos fit the contours of the human body.

“When you look at you, there is nothing flat about you,” said Dr. Ramchan Woo, head of LG’s mobile product planning division. “Everything is curved. And that is why we wanted to make a curved phone.”
Curved, it most definitely is. Woo said the business worked through countless prototypes to find the arc of the bend just right.

As well as the firm considers the 6 – inch curved screen, when held about a foot from your face, will replicate the viewing experience of watching content on one of its own curved 55-inch TV screens.
For versatility, well, it truly is kinda, sorta flexible.

But what was intriguing was a demo unit where the display was separated from your phone. The display is a film, in regards to the width of a sheet of paper than can retract into a tube. It offered a glimpse of precisely how flexible screens could become one-day.

At this time, the multi-touch sensors still sit within the telephone, or so the display doesn’t work minus the telephone. Yet.

Woo wouldn’t discuss potential plans for utilizing the display on other devices. But he insisted the LG G Flex was merely the start of a revolution.


IDC is projecting Windows tablets to reside in 10.2 percent of the market by 2017, growing from a projected market share of 3 percent this year. By comparison, tablets predicated on iOS and Android will show little dips in market-share.

With time, Microsoft’s market share within the tablet marketplace will increase, due to more gadgets and aggressive pricing. But underlying Windows OS, device layout and program issues will persist to stop growth, said Tom Mainelli, research director of tablet research at IDC.


Windows Problems

Approval of Windows 8 wasn’t as strong as Microsoft hoped, as well as the business confused customers by creating one OS designed for both desktops and tablets, Mainelli said.

“Microsoft still believes people want a tablet with all the power of a PC,” Mainelli said, adding that people don’t want the complexity of the PC in tablets.

Consumers are also still not sure what to make of the 2 OS flavors – – Windows 8 for x86 processors and Windows RT for ARM processors – – Mainelli mentioned. Microsoft in October sent Windows 8.1 to be successful Windows 8.

“They have to sell components with one of three Windows OSes, that’s at least one too many,” he said. “Microsoft internally has a better handle on it, now they need to advertise it better.”

In addition, the application ecosystem for Windows 8 is still weak, Mainelli said. Microsoft is pushing incorporate program development for laptops and tablets, but that approach is complicated by the various screen sizes on several different products, he said.

“I don’t think that’s the best way to create applications for some of the platforms” because users connect to several devices in various ways, Mainelli said.


Design Problems

Only 1 success tablet is necessary for Windows Operating System to succeed, however there’s been little innovation in system designs, Mainelli said. There are lots of device vendors starting similar Windows tablets. Microsoft, Dell, HewlettPackard, Toshiba, Acer and others are providing Windows tablets.

“How those sellers differentiate continues to be challenging,” Mainelli said.

Microsoft is trying to parlay its previous success in PCs into hybrid devices that have tablet and notebook functionality. The hybrid devices come with a range of characteristics which include detachable displays, and hybrids are also are being referred to as “2-in-1″ devices.

“The notion of 2-in-1 seems great, but we haven’t seen success in items,” Mainelli said.

However, Mainelli expects a big advertising drive for Windows tablets which could foster shipments. Microsoft will not give up in the tablet industry, Mainelli said.

“Microsoft and its partners would like to see that increase happening more rapidly.”