<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Redmond Photocopier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/index.php/2008/11/05/the-great-redmond-photocopier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/index.php/2008/11/05/the-great-redmond-photocopier/</link>
	<description>The Leader In Technical News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:27:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fcassia</title>
		<link>http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/index.php/2008/11/05/the-great-redmond-photocopier/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Fcassia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/?p=120#comment-588</guid>
		<description>You say: &quot;That said, IBM joined the other lawsuits against Microsoft and OS/2 was no longer developed by Microsoft (IBM developed OS/2 3 and “Warp” 4 after Microsoft left).&quot;

You got the timinmg all wrong, buddy. Microsoft´s OS/2 was 16-bit OS/2 1.x. IBM and Microsoft parted ways BEFORE IBM created the first 32-bit OS/2 versioin, which included a new object-oriented desktop, the Workplace Shell, developed entirely in-house by IBM. That was OS/2 2.0, way long BEFORE WARP. OS/2 2.0 was released in April 1992.

Then came OS/2 2.1, 2.1 &quot;for windows&quot; (which installed on top of DOS+Windows3.1, and OS/2 3.0 aka &quot;Warp&quot;, in 1994. By then the memory footprint was reduced so that the OS could be used even in system with 4MB RAM (previous versions required 8megs or more, which at the time was a lot, because memory was hella expensive).

Best
FC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say: &#8220;That said, IBM joined the other lawsuits against Microsoft and OS/2 was no longer developed by Microsoft (IBM developed OS/2 3 and “Warp” 4 after Microsoft left).&#8221;</p>
<p>You got the timinmg all wrong, buddy. Microsoft´s OS/2 was 16-bit OS/2 1.x. IBM and Microsoft parted ways BEFORE IBM created the first 32-bit OS/2 versioin, which included a new object-oriented desktop, the Workplace Shell, developed entirely in-house by IBM. That was OS/2 2.0, way long BEFORE WARP. OS/2 2.0 was released in April 1992.</p>
<p>Then came OS/2 2.1, 2.1 &#8220;for windows&#8221; (which installed on top of DOS+Windows3.1, and OS/2 3.0 aka &#8220;Warp&#8221;, in 1994. By then the memory footprint was reduced so that the OS could be used even in system with 4MB RAM (previous versions required 8megs or more, which at the time was a lot, because memory was hella expensive).</p>
<p>Best<br />
FC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contextfree</title>
		<link>http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/index.php/2008/11/05/the-great-redmond-photocopier/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>contextfree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/?p=120#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Oh, and M isn&#039;t object-oriented either!  It&#039;s declarative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and M isn&#8217;t object-oriented either!  It&#8217;s declarative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contextfree</title>
		<link>http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/index.php/2008/11/05/the-great-redmond-photocopier/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>contextfree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/?p=120#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Sorry for commenting late and all, but wtf.  Oslo&#039;s M has exactly two things in common with MUMPS&#039; M: the name, and that it&#039;s a formal language of some kind.  Ditto Digital Mars&#039; D.  There&#039;s a vague resemblance to Date &amp; Darwen&#039;s D if you squint.  

Where the hell did you get this?  Some random comments from Slashdot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for commenting late and all, but wtf.  Oslo&#8217;s M has exactly two things in common with MUMPS&#8217; M: the name, and that it&#8217;s a formal language of some kind.  Ditto Digital Mars&#8217; D.  There&#8217;s a vague resemblance to Date &amp; Darwen&#8217;s D if you squint.  </p>
<p>Where the hell did you get this?  Some random comments from Slashdot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  thecoffeedesk.com/news/index.php/2008/11/05/the-great-redmond-photocopier/feed/ ) in 0.24889 seconds, on Sep 6th, 2010 at 11:43 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Sep 7th, 2010 at 12:43 am UTC -->